image.png

The Problem: Underfitting vs. Overfitting (Naruto Edition)

Think of bias as Sakura’s early Naruto skills - basic, predictable, but kinda weak. A high-bias model (like Sakura punching air) makes oversimplified assumptions.

For example, using a straight line (y=mx+by = mx + by=mx+b) to fit data that’s clearly a curve.

Result? Underfitting - your model’s as useful as a screen door on a submarine.

On the flip side, variance is like Nine-Tails Naruto: chaotic, unpredictable, and way too extra.

A high-variance model memorizes the training data’s noise (like Naruto’s rage fits), leading to overfitting.

It’s great on paper but flops in real life - like predicting your crush will text “👀” because they did once during a full moon.

The Maths Sorcery : Error = Bias² + Variance + 🔮

The total error in your model can be split into three parts: